Luxurious Travel Choices Spark Debate in Wealth Inequality Battle

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders have been caught in a glaring contradiction as they were filmed boarding a $15,000-per-hour private jet for their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour, despite their long history of denouncing luxury travel and climate pollution.

Key Insights

  • AOC and Sanders were captured boarding a private jet while campaigning against wealth inequality and corporate influence in America.
  • The private jet used costs approximately $15,000 per hour to charter and consumes 365 gallons of fuel every 1.32 hours.
  • Sanders has spent nearly $250,000 on private jet travel in the first quarter of 2025 and spent over $1.9 million on private jets during his 2020 campaign.
  • Both politicians have previously criticized CEOs and wealthy individuals for private jet usage, with AOC publicly asking, “How many private jets do these CEOs need?”
  • Neither Ocasio-Cortez’s nor Sanders’ offices have responded to requests for comment about the apparent contradiction.

The Luxury Travel Contradiction

The self-proclaimed champions of working-class Americans and vocal critics of excessive wealth, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders, are facing intense scrutiny after being filmed boarding a private jet during their “Fighting Oligarchy” tour. The aviation choice seems at odds with their platform criticizing America’s wealthiest citizens and corporations. The Bombardier Challenger jet they were spotted using costs an estimated $15,000 per hour to charter, according to multiple reports, raising questions about fiscal responsibility while soliciting donations from supporters who are told the campaign is “not paid for by billionaires.”

The tour has included stops in cities like Tucson, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, Nampa, and Bakersfield, with the stated purpose of addressing “the oligarchs and corporate interests who have so much power and influence in this country.” Meanwhile, their method of transportation between these rallies directly contradicts their public messaging against luxury and excess, particularly coming from politicians who have been outspoken about environmental concerns and wealth inequality in America.

Environmental Hypocrisy

The environmental implications of their travel choices have drawn particular criticism. Private jets pollute approximately 14 times more than commercial aircraft per passenger, according to a 2021 report. The Bombardier Challenger consumed 365 gallons of fuel every 1.32 hours, and studies indicate private jet users produce nearly 500 times more carbon emissions annually than the average person. This presents a stark contradiction to Sanders’ own statement that “climate change is the single greatest threat facing our planet,” and his vocal support for the Green New Deal.

“Climate change is the single greatest threat facing our planet.” – Sanders

Sanders’ private jet usage isn’t new. Financial records reveal he spent over $1.9 million on private jet travel during his 2020 presidential campaign. More recently, he has spent nearly $250,000 on private jet travel in the first quarter of 2025 alone. AOC has also been spotted traveling in luxury, recently seen flying first-class on a commercial JetBlue flight, further distancing both politicians from the everyday travel experiences of their constituents.

A History of Anti-Wealth Rhetoric

Both politicians have built their careers criticizing excessive wealth and corporate influence in America. Ocasio-Cortez has previously questioned wealthy CEOs about their private jet usage, directly asking, “How many private jets do these CEOs need?” She has also stated that “It is insatiable. It is unacceptable. I do not know how any person can say I need another $100 million before another person can have health care.” These comments now appear in sharp contrast to their own travel choices.

“How many private jets do these CEOs need?” – AOC

The campaign’s website states it aims to “have real discussions across America” about wealth inequality and corporate power, and proudly declares it is “Paid for by friends of Bernie Sanders (not the billionaires).” However, critics argue that using luxury travel methods undercuts their message about fiscal responsibility and environmental stewardship. The silence from both offices when asked to comment on the controversy has only intensified public scrutiny of what many view as a case of “rules for thee, but not for me.”